Capitalism and Class in the Gulf Arab States By Adam Hanieh (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 266 pages.)

Main Article Content

Junaid S. Ahmad

Keywords

Abstract

To label Adam Hanieh’s Capitalism and Class in the Gulf Arab States an afterstudy


of the 2008 financial crisis is a grossly unfair assessment. While the


book does explore the implications of the Gulf states’ financial slump, it also


provides a nuanced analysis of their class structures and relation to the global


capital system. The exponential growth of the Gulf Cooperation Council


(GCC) states is the book’s main subject; however, Hanieh dexterously avoids


the common errors involved in the region’s economic analysis and thus adds


to the corpus of literature pertaining to both the GCC and the wider global


economy.


The class structures and wealth prevailing in the GCC are often seen as


an outcome of the states being oil rich. Hanieh problematizes this narrative


by positing that this wealth and structuring is not “accidental” and that while


oil is undeniably important, it is not the sole reason for the region’s situation.


He urges the reader to look beyond the hydrocarbon wealth, because “much


like its desert cousin, the mirage – what visitors actually see in the oil-fueled


boom is not the full picture” (p. 2).


Hanieh’s choice of viewing the GCC holistically, instead of addressing


specific nation-states, is significant. The “internationalization” of the local


economy and class structure results in the dissolution of class boundaries


among the states and paves the way for capitalism. But at the same time, however,


capitalism needs to be valorized in a coherent and material time and


space. This valorization has taken the special form of the regional GCC and


becomes the study’s focal point. This regionalization has displaced “power


upwards to the regional scale, weakening the ability of the individual member


states to control the movement of goods and capital within the intra-GCC


space” (p. 104).


The author also problematizes the “rentier-state” theory through a Marxian


framework. He urges the reader not to consider the state, and particularly


the states of the Gulf nations, as a “thing” or an automatic reflection of the


capitalist class, but rather as “a particular expression of class formation” (p.


12). This also implies that the state has greatly facilitated the development of


the GCC’s prevailing “hot-house” economy (p. 15).


The study’s regional nature culminates in the analysis of “Khaliji” capital.


In the Gulf states, the internationalization of capital manifests itself in a


regional form as the “circuits of capital are themselves elaborated at the ...

Abstract 62 | PDF Downloads 28